The Back-Benchers' Blog

Author Archive

Mumbai Diaries (Dhobi Ghat)

Posted by Kartik Varadpande on January 31, 2011

The movie could have been named that way too. It is primarily what the city is, and not particularly about a dhobi or a ghat. Though it does include those. And the rich and classy. The glamorous and glassy. The lonely painter. The wannabe actor. The photographer. The video recorder. The bottom of the pyramid. And the top. But most importantly all the layers in between, overlapping and cross-connected.

I personally liked the movie. For me it painted the collage in bits and pieces, as the city actually is. All those bits and pieces are not supposed to make sense together if seen independently. But they exist together, that’s the reality.

Movie poster

Image courtesy: http://dhobighatmovie.com/

It avoided the usual melodrama like gang-violence, sects, politics etc. I mean it’s all true, but the common man is so not bothered or affected. Maybe the underplay was crafted for my middle-class line of thought. I am a local-travelling Mumbaikar (see here). Probably that’s why I enjoyed it. Like this indexed comic.

Sometimes the city makes sense, sometimes it just sits on the fence and shrugs off. Sometimes it rhymes, sometimes it chimes and sometimes it doesn’t. Because that is how a Mumbaikar lives. Often lyrical, but almost always practical. People like to call it the ‘spirit of Mumbai’. I think it’s more a necessity. Others call it helplessness. I think it’s the ability to move on too. The movie captures these aspects in its way.

Is Dhobi Ghat worth the critical acclaim? Possibly, because some enjoy the nuances and shades of colours instead of bright hues. Is it as trash as some have made it out to be? Possibly, because it doesn’t have a traditional storyline to latch on to.

It doesn’t matter.

It inherently belongs to the artistic expression. The person who enjoys such thing the most is always the artist herself. The viewers who may or may not like the subjectivity, are (arguably) less important. The act is more enjoyable than a happy ending. And that is why it is not commercial cinema. Some call it a mix of commercial cinema and art cinema. I think that is only because it has a big name.

In all it was an enjoyable experience, especially for a person close to Mumbai. But be ready to leave unimpressed. Everyone doesn’t enjoy jazz music. That doesn’t make jazz good or bad.

In retrospect calling it Mumbai Diaries (Dhobi Ghat) would have killed the subtlety.

Share on facebook

Posted in Bollywood, General | 2 Comments »

Passing It On Rationally

Posted by Kartik Varadpande on July 27, 2010

Mandar’s post got me thinking. Do I solve problems around me or kick them down the lane and let someone else bother?

Assume an ideal world where everyone acts good and goes on solving problems. In this world one has every incentive to sit idle and benefit from others i.e. cheat the system. When this is done some more times, some good people will get frustrated and start watching their back . Worse still, some will begin cheating. So the equilibrium is like a world more representative of the real world where there is balance of cheaters and those who get cheated.

I may get cheated because of my naivety, foolishness, imprudence, lack of negotiating power in a given situation, or whatever reason (called ‘rent-seeking behaviour’ in economic terms). The point is not to take a moral stand and paint rent-seeking as bad. Rent-seeking is sub-optimal for development, but it is bound to be present because of our bounded rationality.

Let me deviate a little on a stretched analogy. Rent-seeking is an easier way of earning, but only a transfer of wealth from one person to another while fighting over the share of same pie and passing problem to someone else. Creating wealth is like solving problems, or increasing size of the pie. Increasing the pie in itself does not ensure that I get the increased share I deserve. If care is not taken it will induce free-riding and dependence.

So while solving problems is good, there is a powerful argument against doing too much good for the society – in order to avoid people becoming dependent on you. In a perfectly rational world it is good to solve all the problems I can. In the real world I guess it is better to stick to few things I really care about.

The positive side is that everyone ultimately acts in own interest. And that is sustainable only when pie increases rather than fighting over own share. So problems will get solved, though they may take their own sweet time.

The catch is how fast we bring ourselves (and then others) closer to rationality.

Posted in Economics, General, Philosophy | Leave a Comment »

Markets in Mumbai Local

Posted by Kartik Varadpande on March 29, 2010

Mumbai local trains are special. Many adjectives have been attached to them – crowded, chaotic, efficient, (mostly) timely, etc. However chaotic, there are patterns in the chaos. There are rules and norms – mostly unwritten. But today I want to write about something different about these locals.

A passenger is inside the train for an average of 30-45 minutes in each trip. If he is lucky he can get a seat and catch some sleep. If he is still lucky, he can get to stand at the door and enjoy fresh air. Otherwise he doesn’t have much choice. If he looks at others (especially if straight in the eye), that is a gross violation of privacy and only results in dirty looks back (unwritten rule #2363). If he has a newspaper to read, it should be folded vertically (rule # 1522) and so on. Basically there are not many activities one can do apart from looking here and there.

This is a dream situation for a marketer – large number of (frustrated) people generally thinking about futility of their daily routines, with no choice but to look at limited space inside the train, on average for 30-45 minutes each day in the morning and evening. I mean why would you advertise in IPL when the alternative is so potent… and free?

Example of ad-space in Mumbai local train

Coming to these ads in local trains, again patterns start emerging from the chaos. Tyler Cowen often points to situations where basic economics seems to work in remote/funny/bizarre settings under title ‘markets in everything’. Here is one such case – Babas/Jyotishis advertising inside Mumbai local trains.


First there was only Adil Shah who had ’100% solution’ on ‘A to z problems’ within ‘ 12 hours’.


Within days, others pitched in offering solutions in ’11 hours’ also offering specializations.


Then more competitors came, cut down the time to ’10 hours’ and also offered more variety of services.


Recently one poster was spotted with ’7 hours’ time for solution. And don’t forget the cashback offer – “Mere kaam ko katne wale ko nagad inaam”.

Then there are others who have found own niches without needing to mention hours for solution. For example, giving a Rin-style slap to the competition – “Bangali babaon se sawdhan, lete hain paisa karte nahi kaam” and then echoing the cashback offer. Free prototype yantra is offered for 3 days (damn that shareware). Then he is also a Gold medalist (in what). Possibilities are endless.

However there are couple of things I have not understood yet which are common to literally every one of these Babas. Why every one of them require exactly two mobile no.s? And What’s with Saibaba’s pic on either of top corners?

Well, to summarize the competition, here are USPs of the Babas spotted recently.

Name Time for solution Speciality
Adil Shah 12 A to Z samasyaon ka samadhan
Rajbharati 11 Not much (rip off from Adil Shah)
Baba Samani ji 11 Guarantee card
Baba Ali Khan 11 “Pyar me chot khaye avashya mile”
Miyan Kamal Khan 10 “My promise”
“101% solution” (in a different version of poster)
Guru Moin ji Samrat 7 “Chetavni Chetavni”
Cash back
Guarantee card
Sikandar Shah - Gold medallist
“Lete hain paisa Karte nahi kaam”
Cash back
Free shareware prototype
Jyotish Ranaji - Recognizes name by face
Multi-colour poster

Remember, all these posters are printed and put inside trains without paying anything to the railways. So cost is minimal. Anybody visiting such a crack ‘baba’ is sure to get ripped off. So potential earning comes at negligible cost. There is no wonder this market and the ad-space is hotly contested.

Markets do work in everything.

Share on facebook

Posted in Economics, Utility | Tagged: , , , | 15 Comments »

RTI being diluted secretly?

Posted by Kartik Varadpande on February 20, 2010

This report in Outlook is sad. Dept of personnel and training (DOPT) is seeking to dilute RTI in a hidden and roundabout manner (HT: TTR).

The news is worrisome on many aspects. First, RTI is supposed to uphold accountability and transparency, and its own amendment mechanism is shrouded inside veils of secrecy. In fact DOPT ignored the requests to publish minutes of meeting in which these recommendations were rejected. It was Shailesh Gandhi, one of the information commissioners, who went ahead and sent out the MoMs in powerpoint presentation after five months of futile requests to DOPT. (Unrelated but very interesting note on Shailesh Gandhi and others – here)

Second, it seems like these are amendments sought by implementers, not by policy-makers. I am sure that there can be workarounds – more PIOs or e-governance. “You are increasing my work” cannot be an excuse if the work is required in upholding accountability.

But most importantly, if there is one politician I am willing to trust it is Manmohan Singh. So these amendments coming from bureaucrats under his office are immense WTF. They have an incentive to increase their (and their fellows’) powers. But PM has a larger objective function to optimize.

It was Congress-led UPA who went on to legislate RTI. Now if RTI is diluted, it will be again under Congress-led UPA. Congress party has been pro-bureaucracy all the time. So in a sense it was passing of RTI that was more surprising than these amendments. But then look at other choices we have – BJP-led alliance which is confused whether to keep its “positioning” of Hindutva, and third-front which is pulled in as many directions as its members. It was always about choosing the lesser evil. But I digress.

RTI is a wonderful tool in common man’s hands. PMO is taking it too easy in allowing such narrow interests to creep in.

Posted in Politics | Tagged: , , | 5 Comments »

Pune Police on Valentine’s day

Posted by Kartik Varadpande on February 2, 2010

This moral policing is not irritating, it is funny. The directive basically seeks to prohibit certain kind of behaviour between 3rd and 15th Feb. Mind you, only certain seven kinds of behaviour.

If I would be in Pune on 14th Feb, absent the directive, here is what I would have done -  in decreasing order of priority.

  1. Dance like Dayal baba
  2. Get drunk and play colours 2 full weeks before Holi
  3. Organize a rally

Now that all these are banned till 15th Feb, I am thinking about 3 options. First, I can wait for a couple of days. I was anyway not going on a date or something on 14th, what gives on couple of days later?

The second option is more appealing. There are enough loopholes to exploit. For example, I can wear a kurta-pajama and still dance like Dayal baba. Or I can play colours without getting drunk, presumably with a greater nuisance value.

Or third, I am going to fantasize about someone to the extent it becomes creepy, and then kill the next person I see because the world doesn’t act how I want. I mean, that is not one of the seven banned acts.

They could have just said “We are watching out for unlawful behaviour. Everyday.”

And yet, this is only about police, not about the likes of Shiv-sena.

Posted in General, Politics, Religion | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

China, censorship and morality

Posted by Kartik Varadpande on January 22, 2010

For ethical and/or commercial reasons, Google threatens to say Goodbye to China. Google was complying with Chinese censorship, now it is in civil disobedience. Complaining that cyber-attacks over its systems originated from China (likely from intelligence network, given the sophistication) Google was no longer in good conscience to support self-censoring of search results (update: Google is back to self-censorship, and US government has lodged a formal complaint to China).

Meanwhile analysts are wondering whether the low market penetration in Chinese search market was much worth to Google anyway. China is suspected to have acted in bad faith. It is sad that a large population can be cut off from useful information just because their government feels insecure.

But I have a different point to make. It is time others stopped patronizing China (or India, or Africa, or anyone who does not inherit Western values). China is trying to set rules for the games it plays rather than playing on someone else’s turf. Many in Western free speech lobby are taking a moral stand over Chinese censorship. I think it is ok for China to allow or disallow rights to citizens.

For example I have no business asking my neighbour to behave to her family members, unless we are married to each other. Or consider this – your friend’s child is accessing porn online. Should you be bothered about it? Well, you can suggest to your friend, but let’s not get preachy.

Don’t get me wrong, I am not trying to justify the attacks and I am a strong believer in democracy. But people outside have no moral high ground in imposing a belief system on China. Everybody has all the right to suggest that censorship is sub-optimal in the end.  But I would not judge China as immoral just because it filters internet access.

PS: Interesting graphic.

Posted in General, Technology, War | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.