The Back-Benchers' Blog

Author Archive

A Wrong Guy Called Guy

Posted by Tejas Pol on December 4, 2010


In what I call as ‘status message survey’ of mine today, I found this in the gtalk status of one of my close friends, the story of a guy mistakenly interviewed live on BBC.
The entire atmosphere of the ‘accident’, the imagination of what must have gone on in Guy’s head and his priceless expression, all had a compounded effect manifested in we colleagues literally rolling on the floor laughing.

What followed was a ‘localization’ of the joke, including asking each other to imagine what would have happened if any of us were called for a job interview and been taken to a very make up room, of all the places. The laughter, the smiling to myself and then the thinking about it later gave way to striking thoughts.

How come no one raised an objection to what was being said in the very interview? Rather, it is almost surprising to notice that there indeed is nothing objectionable in the interview given by Guy, and any composed, sane person would have been able to handle such a situation equally well! Looking thus at the ‘value’ of such a high profile interview on BBC which was pretty much successfully handled by a totally clueless guy Guy, did certainly make me think of what is happening all over the slew of media channels today, aka “aap ko kaisa lag raha hai?” and the jazz. I think Guy had a very fitting response to the overkill meted out today, just because we have the air, and can make the gadgets that can handle the frequency. Why does this smell to me of ‘growth for the sake of growth’?

More interestingly on the other hand, Guy belonged to Congo, widely regarded as belonging to one of the ‘developing’ regions of the world.
Would it have been any different if it were someone from, say, Paris or Washington DC instead of Mr Guy Goma?

A seemingly unrelated memory surfaced at this moment. In his book ‘The Outliers’, Malcolm Gladwell very aptly describes how the qualities of being assertive, outspoken and confident are passed on as part of legacy in a family. Gladwell gives us an example of an extremely brilliant person ‘failing’ to be educated in the popular sense of success apparently because he could not convince his teachers to let him take classes that were logistically and financially more feasible for him to take. On the other hand, a child belonging to a wealthy family is raised while being instructed to speak up for himself.
It would have been perfectly acceptable for Goma to stand up and clearly ask ”Are you sure you are looking for jee-ow-em-ey Goma? I think you got my last name wrong” and this funny accident would not have happened.
What struck me here is that Guy didn’t do this, and rather quietly conceded to the possibility of his last name being pronounced wrongly.

Wait a second.
‘Goma’ being pronounced ‘Kewney’?

That again reminded me of Freakonomics, ‘shaw-teed’ being spelt as ‘Shithead’ and the related incident and the theory presented there.
What, if not deep rooted diffidence, made Goma to so quietly concede to that his name could be SO wrongly pronounced at the BBC?

That he didn’t actually, did do him (and ultimately us, laughing) some good indeed, but still; why?

Posted in Development, General, Television | 1 Comment »

Inshallah!

Posted by Tejas Pol on June 4, 2010

Years before I went to spend almost a year in Bangladesh, I did not have any Muslim friends, and like many other things (e.g. why gold is precious), my impressions in that regard were manufactured by various media.

The friendly staff, wonderfully despite a towering yet slowly diminishing language barrier, of our guesthouse in Dhaka, introduced me to this beautiful expression, meaning ‘God willing’.

I do not know whether I believe in God or not (Whether it is about the expressions on Pt. Bhimsen Joshi’s face while he instills ‘Desh Raag’ into the pristine Lonavala surroundings, or about two extremely tired works-persons at the depot of the State Transport exchanging pleasantries apparently after meeting each other after 6 long years, is a matter of a separate post.), but I particularly liked this way of expressing the uncertainty of life, at the same time being humbled by the fact that there are umpteen things beyond one’s control. That is of course besides the quote I read somewhere – “if you want to make God laugh, tell him about your plans” (again, to quote an author whose name I forgot, I use masculine gender for God with only as much intention as the French would have while using feminine for table, or the Marathi would have for ‘waaLoo’-sand).

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Philosophy | 14 Comments »

Not Another Beach, OK? Please!

Posted by Tejas Pol on April 21, 2010

“Hey! What are you doing on the 13th, this Tuesday? ” “Man, talk of 12th night na, if 13th is a holiday?!” “Oh f**k that, if you bunk on just 12th, you get 10,11,12 AND 13th! Isn’t that CRAZY? Let’s go somewhere and chill out!” “Ah! That is cool, like a whole freaking Diwali before Diwali! LOL But not another beach haan? Please! Let’s do something else, OK?”

I would have been happy to lose a bet on whether the above were what 90% of the well-to-do youth in Maharashtra were saying, a week before the Maharashtra LA elections.

But I am sorry to have won. A 50-odd% of voting, combined with the fact that most of the lower-class sells votes for the much-needed chicken and beer, only rub it in deeper. A 60+% voting in some of the states of India making headlines is a blatant example.

On the other hand, “Bombai konachi?” “Mink release honar ki nahi?” “Should chance bars be permitted or not?” “Who is a real Maharashtrian?” “Whom should Thashi Saroor marry?” are the typical pre-election issues tossed around. And NOBODY talks of, say rain water harvesting, curbing water waste in cities, sustainability of urbanization; to name only a few of the real issues that lie gaping wide in front of us today.

IMHO, even though elections are really about choosing the least bad of the lot, the much needed public pressure is absent due to the fact that votes are ‘bought’ from most of the lower classes, and due to the apathy of the middle classes; the one which I started with.

And of the classes belonging to the Beyond-It-All aka the Forbes list et al, volumes have already been said in works like ‘Guru’ and ‘Rock N’ Rolla’!

Posted in Development, Philosophy, Politics | Leave a Comment »

On Why Linkin Park is Sarcastic

Posted by Tejas Pol on March 19, 2010

..but in the end, it doesn’t even matter.. So goes the track, ‘In the end’, one of my favourites from LP. It surprisingly struck me while on a visit to the middle-sized towns of Satara and Chiplun last week. The end I was at, was that of the reckless neo-urban lifestyles.

Why reckless, here:

Why lifestyles, is that what we see above is the refuse from households of the towns. Normal households. No heavy industries, no larger-than-life poultry, no pig-rearing farms nor huge slaughterhouses. A part of my survey included asking the citizens ‘do you know where your waste goes?’ to which, strikingly,  ‘to the municipality’ was one of the most enlightening answers launched. And while we talk of new technologies to process waste and blah blah, the real problem apparently was that no one cared for where their waste went. The mere fact that their backyards and porches were clean was enough. The siren-car (‘ghantagadi‘) comes once a day, and clears our bins. We are happy. Our hometown does not have any problems related to solid waste.

If that is the attitude of most of the citizens of a town, where is the public pressure, necessary to ensure action, gonna come from? Or wait, am I mistaken here? Is it even gonna be significant to just make aware all citizens in a town, to what exactly it means to not segregate their waste? To not have a sensible and sensitive attitude towards waste management?

My head spins, and I am still suffering from the acute throat infection I must have picked up from the ubiquitous smoke from one of the dumps. Cannot even begin to imagine how the ragpickers, and more importantly their children, live with and live on this! How long are we going to wait for? Until it comes back to bite us? Even in the end, it does matter!

Share on facebook

Posted in Debate, Development, Economics, Politics, Technology | 15 Comments »

Gt D Pnt!!!

Posted by Tejas Pol on February 26, 2010

If there has to be something called an ‘official turn off’, it is that kind of language. What must have started off as an adaptation with the extra difficult way in sms to type whole words combined with the 160-character limited space, it has now spread to scrapbooks, mails and everywhere there is typing, although with enough space.

A typical argument on this is like:

Me: Hey! How have you been?
The other party (TOP): Um gd ya, hw r u????? btw yr pics r nyc………
Me: Do you mean ‘am good’?
TOP: Cmon man, off crse! U r kidn me?
Me: No man, just making sure. I cannot quite get this way of shortening the text.
TOP: Newayzzzz wt cmra do u hv????

I am now very tempted to write ‘cnn’, but cannot sustain another question in this kind of language, let go of the one about whether it is CNN.

There once was this column in TOI, “Words’ Worth” which used to talk about such stuff. Not sure if it still runs (not quite reading any English daily these days), and would not be surprised either, if I got to know it ceased to be published. In fact it would be the other way round! It must be totally due to lack of readership. That much space can very effectively and profitably be used for ‘sms jk of 2de 4u!’ right?

A typical argument staged by the supporters of such language, is “wtevr man, u gt d pnt, ryte??”. OK, I got the point, but then what is the point? Mangala Godbole, one of my favourite authors, puts it this way (for Marathi though): “What language is to the meaning is cooking is to nutrition. If we were just to get nutrition, why were there so many cuisines and techniques and recipes to cook food? Why wasn’t the mankind just chewing and gulping down raw wheat, leafy vegetables and meat?”.

Unfortunately, in stark straight line with the democratic principles practised where we are, quantity has started dominating over quality; or the very definition of quantity itself has started to get modified, for that matter.

To classify correcting ‘anyways’ to ‘anyway’ as purist, ‘I didn’t knew’ to ‘I didn’t know’ as finicky, and ‘when did you came’ to ‘when did you come’ as perfectionist, is probably OK.

But what about expecting a ‘luk whs cuming on d bch’ being modified to ‘look who is coming to the beach’, at least for the sake of the meaning? Which meaning then, would be a question in order, no?

Posted in General, Philosophy | Tagged: | 23 Comments »

Avatar – A Very Very Strong Message

Posted by Tejas Pol on February 3, 2010

For the uninitiated, it is a movie about how an obsessed certain world attacks another. The obsessed world has ‘advanced scientific’ ideas, and has an inkling about how a certain element found on that distant other planet will bolster the efforts to further enhance Science. The graphics etc part of the movie are far too better and wider talked about than here.

Apart from that, though, what’s gripping is the way the vacillations of the protagonist’s mind are portrayed. I had summarily rejected the idea of watching such a movie which apparently broke all business records on the box office, thinking it must be just another hi-fi graphics science fiction.

Not only that it is exactly that, it is also a movie with a very strong message; for a change. During the opening part of the flick, we are shown how the Earthlings are trying to capture certain area on this planet Pandora. It’s an attempt to obtain this element, lying buried under what is learnt to be the ‘hometree’ of an entire clan on Pandora. The operation is in an advanced stage, wherein all paths are taken to negotiate and convince the clan to move away from the precious site. It is here, that we think the Earthlings are diplomats, and are trying to take things at ease, meaning no harm to the indigenous. To such an extent, that it is convincing enough to portray the natives (Na’avi) as stupidly sticking to their illogical, unscientific roots and so forth.

Quite predictably, they refuse, which in turn gets converted to what is termed as ‘terror’ by the leaders of the Eartlingds-led mission. Now, isn’t that deja vu? Haven’t we come across very similar situations at home and abroad? Tremendous force is deployed to uproot the natives, to whisk them away, if not to distroy them. What happens next must be seen only in the movie, for it is purely beyond words.

It is the vacillations that need deliberation. The hero is shown to shuttle between two lives, one with immense physical capabilities and one without. That is just the initial part, until when he has to weigh between the distroying ‘scientific’ force and the deep rooted faith, which seems to have some scientific connection that is inexplicable to the science he knows. More than the graphics and the special effects, the movie deep down, is about his choices.

The attackers can very well be matched with we-all-know-what (or whom, for these days ideas are forces and nations and peoples themselves), and the attacked too. Somehow, this looks very much connected to the thoughts.

Finally, everyone who can afford watching this movie in a hall (who in turn needs to know) must watch it. Also if there has to be a best movie Oscar to a sensible movie, it has to be to Avatar, for it is a fantabulously made one with a very, very strong message.

Posted in General | 2 Comments »

Development? What development?

Posted by Tejas Pol on January 26, 2010

Much has been said, and is still being said, about how India has ‘risen’ since its independence in 1947. When we look back, we see an era prior to the LPG (liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation), when being financially rich was perceived as a distant, if not unnecessary, dream. This was when the newspapers wrote pure local languages; the people spent much time with their family members; and the children read books in their mother tongues, apart from playing out in the field until dusk time. The father went to work in the morning, when the kids got ready for their school. The mother cooked breakfast, had lunch boxes ready for everyone, and accomplished her missions, mostly as a housewife, or a small time professional.

Then came a time, when there was the so-called Rising, especially of the middle classes of the Indian society. The classes that were presumably lower-middle, who had ‘just enough’, started taking ‘advantage’ of the edge they got by virtue of their education and their country’s global position. ‘Outsourcing’, ‘BPO’, ‘back-office’ and so on became the key words, in the midst of large, white-goods-laden dreams shown to the masses of the country. In pursuit of those (and not certainly happiness as such, for none ever complained about not being happy earlier!), the fuel came from widespread campaigns, just the way a carrot is hung in front of a donkey to keep it going.

Who is the master, where he wants to lead the donkey etc. are points of much research, very interesting nevertheless. But what do we, the people, have since? Incredibly incredibly tough neck-to-neck fight for everything, right from education to as simple as a place to sit in a local bus; increased mental and physical stress at the cost of decreased family time together; much pervasive use-and-throw culture instead of the conserve-to-reuse one; and the list could practically go on and on. Even as we look at all this, it is brazenly being termed as ‘development’.

Here is the question then: what exactly is development, and do we, the Indians, really have it happening?

Posted in General | 2 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers